Remember the world heroe, Muntazer al-Zaidi, the reporter that threw his shoes at Mr.George W. Bush? Well, he was recently in Paris and during a press conference some Iraqi guy threw his shoe at Muntazer. This cool dude in a suit comes up and socks him one in the face and then another before he is pulled away and then he was basically on his own, he didn’t get arrested I assume.
Anyway, here is the video. As to the validity of this one, I think its real. The Al-Zaidi shoe throwing incident has too many kinks for me to call it legitimate, I think that one was just for publicity. This one is for realzzz!
I was in the process of checking my email at Yahoo.com and something stopped me. I don’t know what it was, but a sudden chill went down my back. One of the headlines read “Barack Obama’s New World Order” and I was frozen. I didn’t know what to think anymore. I distinctly remember Henry Kissenger saying that its a perfect opportunity for Barack Obama to establish a New World Order.
So, why did that chill go down my back and why was I so shocked to see that headline? Just Search New World Order in google and you’ll have chills going down your back all week. The phrase New World Order is no longer a mere phrase, but a symbol. A symbol of peace to some and a symbol of oppression for others. Here’s the catch, which one is it “peace” or “oppression”.
We may go along and say the new World Order is for the good of all mankind and peace will surly ensue. However, if it turns out to be a sinister scheme masterminded by elite members of secret societies such as the Masons or the Bilderberg group, it may be too late to take action and stop it. If it’s for peace than why is it so quite? Why is it shrouded in secrecy? Is it already too late?
I found the article rather uninteresting. To be honest I think the government…..I mean media was just trying to throw the term “New World Order” around so when it actually happens (which according to henry kissinger is in the beginning of our next presidents term) the people won’t be surprised and possibly revolt. They’ll just say, “oh, yea New World Order, eh? I heard something about that back in April 2009.”
The phrase ‘new world order’ traces back at least as far as 1940, when author H.G. Wells used it as the title of a book about a socialist, unified, one-world government. The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used it in a 1989 speech.
“A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment,” said Bush before a joint session of Congress. “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: A new era … in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.”
The phrase “New World Order” causes alarm for many Americans, particularly those concerned about an international governing body trumping U.S. sovereignty or those that interpret biblical prophecy to foretell the establishment of a one-world government as key to the rise of the Antichrist. Conspiracy theorists, too, have latched on to the phrase, concerned that powerful financial or government figures are secretly plotting to rule the world.
Kissinger’s ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what “new world order” might actually mean.
“There is a need for a new world order,” Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, “I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system.”
As WND reported, Kissinger was also part of last year’s super-secret Bilderberg Group, an organization of powerful international elites, including government, business, academic and journalistic representatives, that has convened annually since 1954.
According to sources that have penetrated the high-security meetings, the Bilderberg meetings emphasize a globalist agenda and promote the idea that the notion of national sovereignty is antiquated and regressive.
According to Wikipedia their are a number of ways the New World Order could come about.
Just as there are several overlapping and even conflicting theories among conspiracy theorists about the nature of the New World Order, so are there several beliefs about how its architects and planners will implement it:
In 2009, U.K prime minister Gordon Brown talks of “the difficult birth-pangs of a new global order” in a speech warning against what he called “deglobalisation” in the face of the global economic crisis.
So, yesterday Mr.Bush bade his farewell to the country. Blabbing about our journey together and talking about our founders. I think all of it is bubkis. There is no we in I. Mr. Bush made all the decisions. We didn’t make mistakes. He did. We didn’t choose war. He did. We didn’t crash two planes into the twin towers and kill 3000 Americans. He did. We didn’t elect the worst president in United States history. He did.
This is a farewell from him to us. It’s not a farewell from us to him. Nor should we acknowledge his farewell.
Yet, new questions arise. We have a new president or is it a new problem? Did we elect our new president or did our new president elect us. Are we making the right decisions or is he making the right decisions. Are there hidden motives? We must look beyond the cameras, beyond the press, we must look into the president and interpret his real intentions. We must look at the people around him and their intentions.
We may be the victims of starvation, and a savior comes along like the president-elect, we jump on the food and submit. We do as he says with no objections, we follow his lead with no caution, we place our trust in a leader that makes promises, but its one thing to make promises and it’s a whole other thing to keep them. Placing your trust in a leader that makes promises is like placing your trust in a lion that says, “I won’t eat you.” Placing your trust in a leader that keeps promises is like placing your trust in a butterfly that says, “I won’t hurt you.”
The saying goes, “If the people lead, the leaders will follow.” A perfect example of that has happened, and been happening, all over the world. It’s time we show our president-elect that we can lead him, that we elect him, that he doesn’t lead us and he doesn’t elect us as his followers because we are weak and media driven. It’s about time we show the media that they don’t pick our leader, that they don’t control us, we do. If we all just suddenly stopped watching TV, they would be grovelling at our feet begging that we do; Then we would be the leaders, right? We would be controlling them.
See, leadership happens when one person wants something that another person can give or make happen, or promise to happen. In this case we have a trash economy, we want it better. We have the worst president in history, we want a better one. Mr.president-elect (Obama) promises he will give us a better economy, and he promises a better president in him. That’s were leadership happens, he leads us because he can do something that we can’t and we want that something.
The media makes money off of our desire to watch TV. Our desire to listen to what ever they say, drives them to elect our president. When we stop watching TV, the leadership role changes. They want us and they will do anything to make us watch TV. Now we control them because we have something that they want-Television ratings…. and money.
So, Mr.Bush I appreciate your farewell, but that’s all it will be….an appreciation. I don’t accept it, I don’t give my farewell to you, I just appreciate it.
I thought I’d show you guys some pics, that I photoshopped
Using some kind of art tool which I can no longer remember.
To much of my surprise I saw, on Yahoo, the above title (minus the questions mark). The story goes, George W.Bush makes a surprise visit to Iraq. During a press conference with Iraqi president (I don’t know his name) a Journalist throws both of his shoes at the President. The President ducked and was NOT hit by either shoe. No one was injured during this fiasco.
As all of you probably know my anti-New World Order attitude, it only seems natural for me to debunk this. I am, and I think you will be pleased with the results.
Before we start I want everyone to see the real thing so here is a video. The captions in the video are what the journalist is saying during his rampant shoe throwing.
Now let me show you the flaws with this whole scenario and why this was all an act…..a rehearsed act. Just like the Bin Laden Videos.
Mr.Bush, Just seconds before a Journalist throws the first of two shoes at him.
Mr.Bush, Just milliseconds before a Journalist throws the second of two shoes at him.
Now lets skip to the more exciting part. While the shoe is actually making its way over Mr.Bush’s head.
Mr. Bush, while the first of two shoes comes over his head.
Let us analyze the first flaw in this act.
"How is Bush able to duck, yet the Iraqi president can't react?"
How is Bush able to swiftly duck, yet the Iraqi president can barely react? That “shoe” is a sandal, which carries significantly less mass which means significantly less velocity.
The second shoe is flying over Bush's head.
Now the flaws.
"The Iraqi President has yet to offer a believable reaction."
The Iraqi President has yet to offer a believable reaction. Unwillingly, extending your arm is in no way protecting the president nor changing the trajectory of the sandal.
Seconds after Bush nearly get hit in the head by two shoes thrown by a journalist.
Now the flaws of this image.
Bush shoos a security guard after the guard comes to his aid.
You may need to watch the video again to spot this one. Mr.Bush actually shoos the guard away as the guard comes to his aid.
Now I want to talk about the key area in this video. It is the whole back half of the room. Here is an untouched picture with no visual aid from me. Pay attention to the back half of the room. Just think, what is missing?
Pay attention to the back half.
Do you know what’s wrong? well, here are the answers.
The chandelier is in the way of the sandal throw.
First off, their are no security guards behind the president or on either side. There isn’t even anyone sitting at the desk to the left. Here’s why, Judging by the reflections of the chandelier off the wall and desk, the chandelier is directly or approximately under the desk and in line with Bush and the Iraqi president. To be honest I’ve never seen the president, or any president, talk at a podium at the FAR right of a room and skip the middle. If Mr.Bush and the Iraqi president were in the middle of the room, like they were suppose to be, and the guards were near the president, like they were suppose to be, The sandal would have hit the chandelier and all havoc would wreak. Pieces of chandelier would be everywhere and the president could have been injured.
If you look at the chandeliers height, based on reflection, it is right in-line with the door which is at a safe guess of 7ft. Assuming that the president is an average height of 6ft that makes the chandelier only 1 foot higher than the presidents head.
Instead of catastrophe, the sandals quietly slam into the wall behind and guards suspiciously run out from the door on the side of the wall behind the president. It took a whopping 7 seconds for the guards to reach the president from that back room as well as the guard that had to stagger over people. According to my calculations if the journalist had a standard hand gun, he could have got off 9 to 11 shots in that same period of 7 seconds. The last time the secret service was not around the president was during John F.Kennedy’s deadly drive through Dallas.
I think what everyone wants is an unbiased prediction into this historic election. Meaning, no government controlled media telling everyone who is going to win. (don’t ask me why we are a democracy if the government controls our media)
Now, let’s look at some statistics just to make sure everyone’s on the same page. This is a prediction that I made back on September 2, 2008.
Note: This is WAS my prediction on Sept. 2, 2008
Okay, now here’s what yahoo predicts or according to yahoo it’s what Real Clear Politics predicts.
Note: This is the prediction of Yahoo (Real Clear Politics) as of Oct. 24, 2008
They actually look pretty much similar, excluding the fact that I basically gave the whole south to Mr.McCain. Since Sept. 2, 2008 I have been doing a lot of thinking about this whole “election thing-a-ma-bob ” and I am looking at this election and comparing it with the past two elections (the one’s with most controversy) and I see a trend. I see the Democrats coming close even winning by a large margin and then something happens, something big, something momentum changing and the Republicans end up winning by half-a-percent. Honestly, I don’t think I’ve ever heard of an election in the world that ended like the last two American ones’ (2000 and 2004).
I’ve come to the partial conclusion of expecting anything and by that I mean the dumbest possible thing that could ever happen. For example, Mr.Bush winning his second term, even the Canadians were laughing at us. I will now proceed to give a full analysis of the election so far.
Barrack Obama flew passed every democrat clearly looking like a favorite amongst Democrats. It ended up being a head to head bout between Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama. Meanwhile, Mr.Mccain was having “hotdogs” with Mr.Bush because he surprised every Republican by pulling a fast one at the end. Ron Paul looked like the clear favorite for Republicans, which he was, until Government controlled Fox News started bashing him non-stop and trying to make a fool of him on television. At the same time, Rudy Gulliani and Mitt Romney wouldn’t stop yelling and laughing at Ron Paul taht they seem to have forgot about their campaigns. Huckabee and Mccain went face to face for awhile and then Mr.Mcain took the nomination and ran to Mr.Bushs’ house to eat “hotdogs” and replace his arms.
So, now we have Barrack Obama and John Mccain face to face and I must say it was looking nasty at sometimes, but Barrack Obama kept his cool. Oh, I almost forgot…Barrack Obama picked Joe Biden for his running mate amongst other choice which included former enemy Hillary Clinton and John Mccain picked Sarah Palin.
Fast forwarding to a few weeks ago and we have Barrack Obama coming out of a tie with Mccain and to waht is now looking like a clear favorite. So, now government run news sources are leading you to believe that Barrack Obama will win, or they are just quite. Wait, what’s this…..a guy named….WHAT? J….Jo….Joe….Joe the Plumber is that what it is. So, now where taking the opinions of unlicensed plumbers?
Do you now see what I mean by the “dumbest possible thing” and people believe it too. Wow, government run news stations really know how to make a big deal out of nothing. Before we start pointing fingers lets get the story right an unlicensed plumber comes up to Barrack Obama and says what are you doing about the taxes and something about socialism and something about taxes and something about that and this and there and you and me ad money and percentages and xbox and rich people. Anyway, Barrack Obama responds by saying I’m spreading the wealth. The plumber and government controlled media say it’s socialism. I have a feeling they don’t know what socialism is. Let’s check:
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
Obviously an unlicensed plumber doesn’t know the simple meaning of socialism. I’m sure he would love communism or Totalitarian government right? Since he wants so much money and no taxes for rich people. I’m sure f he was middle class he wouldn’t be doing this. This is precisely what happens when rich people become snobs. Am I calling our dear friend Joe the unlicensed plumber a snob? Why, yes I am…I am calling him a rich snob that doesn’t want to pay 3% more taxes. Well, what about us Mr.Plumber? what about us…the middle class we wake up in the morning not even knowing if we can keep our house for a week. We wake up and check our email, we check the mail box and find out that we won’t be making our way to work today…or tomorrow.
We wake up in the morning and stand on our front lawn looking at our house, our foreclosed home….our life that was once alive and well, but is now no better than dirt. We get letters in the mail saying our wages will be garnished, we can’t pay our bills, we run America and what do we get? We are the middle class and we always come 2nd. We are the middle class and Mr.Bush doesn’t care as long as we do are job and be middle class like we are suppose to, like a hamster in his cage running around and around and around on our little wheel of despair that brings misfortune and panic in the eyes of many. We are the middle class and Joe the Plumber doesn’t care. Joe the Plumber just wants his check, he just wants his money. Joe the Plumber can pay for his bills he has the money, he doesn’t have to worry about losing his job. He’s making quadruple the amount a middle class American is making. I think Joe the Plumber can wait, It’s about time the middle class come first!
Sorry about that, I kind of went on a little rant. Now we have this Joe the Plumber character popping out to the scene and hints from government controlled media that he is “changing this election”. Well, here’s what I think; I think Joe the Plumber has just altered the course of this election and screwed America. Thanks Joe, Thanks a lot. By the way how much did your friend George and John give you? yea, I’m sure it was more that your $250,000 a year salary right?
For those of you that missed the First Presidential debate on Friday Sept 26, don’t worry because it doesn’t matter. The Presidential debate this election will be less that the center of attention. It all comes down to the veeps’.
Let’s be honest, how long is John McCain going to last? Sarah palin is running for president posing as a vice president and john mccain is just waisting every ones time. I say please don’t miss the Biden/Palin debate, cuz that’s the real deal. We all now that after that show that Obama put on for us in the first debate, we will undoubtedly mop the floor with Mr.Mccain.
The real question is what will Biden do to Palin? Honestly I think the proper match up would be Biden/Mccain and Obama/Palin. Why do I think this, Because Obama is quick to defend attacks and to expose the lies of the republicans. Mccain is too slow, Obama is too fast, Biden is kinda somewhere in the middle, and palin is fast too….I think I haven’t even seen here debate, from what I’ve heard she is “good”.
The most scariest part of this whole nightmare is the rumors…er … the facts that palin is a copy of mr.cheney.
“The heat is on, and the stakes are high, with the potential first ladies’ bake-off underway and organizer Family Circle magazine looking to see which way the cookie is going to crumble. In the past four presidential elections, readers of the magazine have successfully predicted who would be America’s next first lady by favoring her recipe in the magazine’s competition.” -Yahoo News
Alright, now the presidential election can get started. You simply can’t have a proper election with homemade cookies.
“Something with chocolate has melted the hearts of readers in the last four elections. So both Michelle Obama and Cindy McCain might be taking a risk by eschewing everyone’s favorite treat.
Instead, Michelle Obama, wife of Democratic Illinois Senator Barack Obama, has put forward a recipe for shortbread cookies with zest of lemon and orange, and a cheeky kick of almond liqueur Amaretto.” – Yahoo News
Sorry, but I’m not really a fan of lemon and orange zest or shortbread for that matter.
“Cindy McCain, who earlier this year had to apologize for plagiarizing a recipe for passion fruit mousse from Food Network, went for oatmeal butterscotch cookies.
They are “an absolute must whenever the whole family gets together,” says the multi-millionaire heiress to a large beer distribution firm, married to Republican presidential hopeful John McCain.”-Yahoo News
Oooo, those sound delicious I kinda like the McCain’s cookies.
Readers can vote online at the magazine’s website with the results to be published in mid-October, just ahead of the November 4 elections.
At the end of the week, Cindy McCain’s recipe seemed to be slicing through the competition, with one online reader complaining that he had had to go out specially to buy Amaretto so his wife could bake Michelle Obama’s treats. – Yahoo News
“If history is anything to go by, Obama might be in for a rough ride. In 2004, Teresa Heinz Kerry’s pumpkin spice cookies failed to beat off the competition from Laura Bush’s oatmeal chocolate chunk cookies.
Four years earlier the first lady had already set the bar high with her Texas Governor’s Mansion Cowboy cookies made with chocolate chips and coconut, which proved more popular than Tipper Gore’s ginger snaps.
Hillary Clinton won in 1992 and in 1996 with the same recipe for chocolate chip cookies, whipping the competition from Barbara Bush and then Elizabeth Dole.” -Yahoo News
Yea this just doesn’t look good for the Obama’s. It’s probably rigged, just like the election is.
“Democrats erupted in outrage on Thursday after President George W. Bush suggested a pledge by the party’s presidential front-runner Barack Obama to meet Iran’s leader was akin to appeasement of Nazi Germany.” – Yahoo News
Bush made these rude and inappropriate comments in Jerusalem went talking to the Israeli parliament during celebrations for Israel‘s 60th anniversary. “Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along,” Bush said. After saying some thing about a “foolish delusion” he went on to say,
“As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history,”
Now lets hear what Obama has to say about this whole fiasco.
“It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack,” He then went on to say,
“George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president’s extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel,”
As if this was enough McCain wanted a piece of Obama too. He also said something strikingly similar to what Mr.Bush said.
“It shows naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment to say that he wants to sit down across the table from an individual who leads a country that says that Israel is a ‘stinking corpse,’ that is dedicated to the extinction of the state of Israel. My question is, what does he want to talk about?” McCain said.
It was Clinton to the rescue as she came to Obama’s defense although she criticized Obama’s pledge to meet Ahmadinejad. “President Bush’s comparison of any Democrat to Nazi appeasers is both offensive and outrageous on the face of it,” she told reporters.
“Many Democrats slammed Bush and pointed out the words of his own defense secretary, Robert Gates, who said on Wednesday: “We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage with respect to the Iranians and then sit down and talk with them.” – Yahoo News
I must say the Democrats really handled this well, I hope Mr.Bush and his little friend McCain learn their lesson not to mess with the Democrats.
“If George Bush believes engagement with Iran is appeasement, the first thing he should do when he comes home is demand the resignation of his own Cabinet,” former Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, an Obama supporter, said.
House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said Bush’s remarks were “beneath the dignity of the office of the president and unworthy of our representation at that observance in Israel.”
Okay, now here’s what I think. Firstly, I knew something like this was going to happen; I just didn’t know it was going to begin so early. I don’t know if anyone remembers when Mr.Bush called John Jerry a “flip-flopper”, Mr. Bush then went on to win the election. Secondly, thats probably why McCain is so quite; he is thinking of ways (with Mr.Bush) to degrade the Democrats and mainly Barrack Obama. Thirdly, If Barrack Obama becomes the democratic nomanee, which I think he will, then Mr.Bush and McCain will call him a terrorist and basically just make up a bunch of false allegations and throw them upon Barrack Obama, forcing him to waste his time apologizing and trying to flip the false allegations back on McCain while McCain is making massive ground collecting electorial votes at record time. Thus, beating Barrack Obama by 20 to 30%. Thats what I think!